Am I weird?

I hate 90% of what is on TV.  Maybe I don’t hate it, but I don’t want to be bothered with it.  I don’t watch anything current really.  I’ve never seen one episode of Lost, House and I’m sure there are a lot more that I can’t think of.  The only show I’ve actually followed in the past decade was Doctor Who.   Meaning, the only show with an actual plot-line.

Now, I’ve followed documentaries-a-plenty.  I can’t speak for everyone but I’d venture to say not as many people eagerly await the revamped version of Carl Sagan’s Cosmos.

Right now there are a handful of shows I like.  Deadliest Catch is one of them.  It’s fascinating to watch these guys do what they do.  The latest show I started watching, last night, was Pitchmen.  Call me a lunatic but I find that industry rather interesting.  If you haven’t heard about it, it’s got Billy Mays (yes, the Oxyclean guy) and Anthony Sullivan in it.   They take a couple of products, pitch them and see what sticks.  I suppose it’s my creative/inventive mind that sort of evaluates the products and so forth.   So I find interest and entertainment value there.  Plus it’s nice to see Billy Mays actually talk and not yell.

And that takes me to my shows of preference.  I like watching how things are made.  I like watching things explode.  Real explosions, not Hollywood ones.  I like watching tornadoes, again, the real ones.  I like watching nearly anything on science.  I draw the line at biology, never really liked biology!  I like watching Time Warp, the show that slows things down to insane slow motion.  I like watching rockets, again with the explosions, but controlled explosions.  Mythbusters is a great show.  How it’s made is a great show.  Dirty Jobs is a great show.   I suppose it’s “real” reality TV that I like.  I don’t really like the pretentiousness of most reality TV.  Pitchmen is semi-reality I guess but it’s tolerable.

I don’t care who gets voted off an island.  I don’t care who can sing, honestly.  I suppose it’s because those things don’t really directly affect me?  Am I a non-tv elitist?  I guess so!  Nah, a non-everyone else watches it-tv elitist!

I’ve always been that way.  I didn’t like Weezer until about five years AFTER their blue album.  I don’t like bandwagons I guess.  I don’t like fads much either.  I stopped liking fads after the whole color changing shirts craze of the 80s.

I prefer timeless things, with a few exceptions of course.  This is just a semi rant because I get tired of being asked if I watched this or that.  Half of the news online seems to be which Idol got bumped off or who left what show.  The other half is depressing as all hell.  Doesn’t leave much for good stuff, to me.  So I make my own!

But wait, there’s more!

Actually, not really.  That’s it my rant on TV is done.  Now, my next rant: Facebook and other online perils. 😮

What annoys a web designer: Part XI

When you tell a client:

“Yes, here’s the rough design.  I still need to make a few changes and some tweaks but this is basically what it will look like”

And the client responds with:

“Yeah, well we need to change this and that and this and oh that too and this isn’t finished and these links don’t work.”

Then I restate myself.

Then they say:

“Oh…”

Moral of the story?

If I’m still working on it.  It isn’t done!

Still the biggest

I’m straight up copying this from the Gizmodo website.  Great write up on one of the (if not the) greatest achievement of mankind as a collective.

First though, watch the video.  It’s mostly in slow motion and without music might be a bit boring.  The slow motion gives you time to look at this thing and grasp it’s magnitude.  At least a little bit.

November 9, 1967, T-minus 8.9 seconds: Thousands of gallons of kerosene and liquid oxygen begin coursing through the giant center F1 rocket engine: The Saturn V’s ignition sequence has begun. Next, two outer engines are lit, followed 300 milliseconds later by the other two, ignited in pairs to avoid toppling the 364-foot rocket above. Nine seconds after all five engines go to full thrust, the first Saturn V rocket begins to lift from the launchpad, taking the unmanned Apollo 4 check-out module into space.

The launch was flawless. Forty-one years ago to the day, the Saturn V became the biggest, tallest, largest-payload rocket ever to be sent into space. Even more amazingly, it still is.

If you talk about the Moon landings, some people remember Armstrong and Aldrin landing on the moon, and may think of the photo of that famous footprint, or the planting of the flag. I choose to remember the rocket that enabled it all, the Saturn V, a pretty shocking mechanical masterpiece all by itself.

Nearly everything about it is monumental in scale and historic in importance:

• At 364 feet high, it was roughly as tall as a 36-story building.

• Its launch weight of 6.7 million pounds was equal to about 2,200 average late ’60s cars.

• Its orbital payload of 260,000 pounds is the equivalent of about 1,500 average people.

It was designed under the supervision of the rocket man, Wernher von Braun, and was chosen in 1963 from a list of potential systems proposed to make good President Kennedy’s promise that a man would visit the moon within a decade.

The rocket was so very large that it required NASA to build the Vertical Assembly Building, one of the world’s largest buildings. It had to be constructed in three stages, could hold four Saturn Vs at the same time, and was reportedly so large that it had its own weather systems. It’s still used to put Space Shuttle stacks together, and will house the upcoming Ares series rockets too. It’s also home to the four largest doors in the world.

The Saturn V’s first-stage rockets—five F1s made by Rocketdyne—are the most powerful single-nozzle liquid fueled rocket engines ever to see service. The engine bell for each was over 12 feet across. Each engine developed 1.5 million pounds of thrust, drinking over 670 gallons of fuel mixture per second: That’s enough to empty your typical 30,000-gallon swimming pool in around 45 seconds. The F1 even makes the more modern Shuttle seem wimpy, since each F1 had more thrust than all three Shuttle main engines combined.

Its second-stage rockets—five J2s, also by Rocketdyne—were the largest liquid-hydrogen rocket engines in their day, and remained so until the Space Shuttle’s main engines were built. The J2s were also the first rocket engines that were able to restart in mid-flight.

In comparison, America’s first manned rocket, the Redstone, was about the same length as the final stage of the Saturn V. Redstone was actually less powerful than the emergency escape rockets on the manned capsule atop the Saturn V. (I suppose it’s important to note, too, that those escape rockets never had to be used.) And Redstone’s maiden liftoff was only 14 years before the Saturn V’s, which shows the tremendous speed of NASA’s rocket program in the ’50s and ’60s.

Chart of rocket sizes (again, borrowed from gizmodo, thanks!)

Even the Space Shuttle, deemed by some the most complex machine humans have yet built, doesn’t compare to the Saturn V. And if you’re wondering what the unlabeled black rocket in the middle is, it’s Saturn V’s competitor, the Soviet N1 moon-shot rocket. This had four attempted launches, none successful. Part of this was due to lack of management and funding, but part had to do with its incredibly complex first-stage design, which required the synchronized firing of 30 separate rocket engines.

Perhaps most amazing of all facts about the Saturn V is that each of its 12 main Saturn V launches was successful. Two of them suffered in-flight problems including engine cutoffs, but the on-board computers were able to compensate, resulting in a successful mission. The rocket was even considered at one point to act as a prototype for the first stage of the Space shuttle, thereby requiring no solid-rocket boosters. If that had happened, the 1986 disaster that befell Challenger would never have happened.

There were also plans for several post-Saturn V projects on the drawing boards. The best was a super-massive variant with eight engines in each of the first two stages, capable of launching all the International Space-Station hardware to orbit in one shot. Sadly, for political and financial reasons, all variants were canceled.

Today, there are other contenders as NASA suits up for the next moon shot. Though not as tall as its predecessor, the massive Ares V rocket, child of NASA’s somewhat troubled Constellation program, is technically able to put 414,000 pounds of payload into low Earth orbit.

But until the Ares V flies, the Saturn V remains king of rockets. Call me overly nostalgic (or pessimistic, seeing as Ares is well underway), but I’m inclined to think the Saturn V may well keep that title forever.

STS-126

Event: Shuttle Endeavour • ISS ULF2
Date: 11/14/2008
Time: 07:55:00 PM  ET
Details: STS-126 will be the 27th U.S. mission to the International Space Station. The flight will deliver equipment and supplies with a reusable Multi-Purpose Logistics Module.

Click here for more information

Contact: Reservations
Phone: 321-449-4400
Location: LC-39A, Kennedy Space Center, Florida

Yes!  Well I don’t think you can get tickets to this particular launch but there is viewing all up and down the Indian River.  Even though I’ve never SEEN one go up I can assure you that if you’re anywhere in the area; you’ll know one is going up.  This launch will be shortly after nightfall and those are particularly dazzling.  I like day launches as you can see the vehicle a lot better but any successful launch is a good one.

That’s right, one week from today! W00t! I love launch day preparation.

What’s new in Space!

So very tired of politics.  So, I’m taking a break from that bantering.

Now, On to something far more fascinating: Space!  Lots of things going on in the next few months so lets get to one of them now.

There is a new show that will be showing on NatGeo this Sunday (11/02/08) at 8pm EST.  It’s called Five Years on Mars.  It chronicles the adventures of two tiny rovers that have been present, on Mars, for a combined 10 years (between the two of them).  They hold a special place in my heart since they were both launched the year my first son was born.  What is amazing about this?

They were sent to Mars on a 90-day mission, but almost five years later the rovers Spirit and Opportunity have traveled farther, seen more, and survived longer than anyone imagined possible, earning a place among the most prolific explorers in history.

These rovers were supposed to last 90 days or thereabouts.  That’s all that was required of them.  Hubble is to deep space as these rovers are to Mars.  That is of course in conjunction with  thr MRO (Mars Recon Observatory).  Having far exceeded their lifespan, Opportunity and Spirit have provided simply invaluable data about the red planet.

Leaving on a Delta II never to return to Earth again, these tiny ambassadors of Earth made the months long journey to endure the loneliest of missions.  In a place where most or all life would perish, the little robots pressed on.  Through a barrage of technical difficulties they pressed on, still.  They are still pressing on, to this day.  How long until they are rendered frozen by the inhospitable frozen desert?  I can only guess.

Perhaps one day, in the distant future, when man begins his travels to Mars, our paths with these rovers will cross again.  Imagine coming face to face with history.  Something our distant future ancestors will have to remind them of how far humanity has come.

[display_podcast]

Saving the Space Shuttles

Read my blog for a few minutes and you’ll quickly realize I’m a science nut. Particularly a space nut. Even MORE specifically space exploration. Now I wanted to make a post about this because of how strongly I feel on it.

In case you didn’t know, the Shuttle fleet is set to be retired in 2010.  That’s less than 1 1/2 years away!  That was the mandate set forth.  I want to say they had planned to have a new operational vehicle by 2012.  That is not going to happen.  In fact it will be 2015 before the new system is ready.  That’s FIVE YEARS with no American manned space flights.  The United States has ponied a lot of money for the ISS (International Space Station).  How does that make sense?  Go ask Russia to take us?  Sure, for 2 billion dollars, comrade!

No, not good at all.  Whomever the next President is, will have a huge say in this.  Both candidates seemed to have expressed the concerns I’ve stated.  If this program gets ditched, and we’re begging the Russians for rides; I’m going to be one pissed mofo.

But with that said, I’m just glad people are realizing it and I will agree with Jim Lovell who said.  Keep flying them if they work? Duh?

Hubble Servicing Mission

Does anyone remember when Hubble was launched?  Remember how we all waited to see those brilliant images come down?  As they started to beam down to earth we all looked at each other thinking “that’s good, right?”  Those in the know immediately knew it wasn’t right.  Hubble was near-sighted.  The most expensive telescope ever built didn’t work.

Two years later a daring plan was set into motion to fix hubble.  Essentially it would be given glasses and other hardware would be upgraded as well (solar panels, gyros, etc).   Astronauts worked feverishly on Hubble until all the repairs were made.  Would they work?  Could NASA redeem itself?

The answer is a resounding “yes”.  Not only redemption but triumph.  As the new images came in, it was clear the mission was a success and our view on the Universe would never be the same again.  Chances are that you’ve seen a photo taken by Hubble.  To be more clear, if you’ve seen a picture of space in the last 15 years, it’s a good chance Hubble took it.  Sure there are scopes that are larger and gather more light but Hubble has the advantage.  It doesn’t put up with atmosphere.  No rainy days, cloudy days and it’s always night time in space.  Well to a degree it is.

NASA has serviced the Hubble a couple of times since that first servicing.  Upgrades to equipment, new cameras, better cameras and more sensitive instruments to bolster it’s scientific contribution even more.

Later this year NASA will service the Hubble one final time.  The telescope has been a workhorse for so many years and taken some of the most stunning images of the Cosmos known to man.  I’d love to be there to see the shuttle go up.  Might still happen but I won’t set my heart on it.

http://hubblesite.org/gallery/

XHTML/CSS

So about 6 months ago I got this job as a web designer.  For 98% of the time I’ve been doing just that, web design.  A few other things here and there but that’s not my point.

I get really excited when I learn something new or have that “eureka” or “oh THAT is how that works” moment.  I can say that in 6 months I have learned a metric crap ton of stuff, mostly through trial and error.  I also have to say there is a lot left to learn.  I really want to work on my PHP/MySQL skills.

WordPress has been a great test bed for some theme modding as far as CSS goes.  I even went back to a site I designed at work some months ago and found I’d learned better ways to code things between then and now.  So the site that isn’t quite live yet is already in v2.0, haha!

Code can be fun as it can be frustrating.  Mix in that I do have to design Flash on occasion.  Flash isn’t like riding a bike.  In Flash you UIOLI … uh, I made that up.  It means Use It Or Lose It.  I teeter on the verge of losing it right about the time I use it so I’m keep it at least rudimentary enough to accomplish what I need.  I do not have any desire to become an expert in Flash.  Simply too much to try and cram in.  Ideally, at this point I’d like to become well versed in what I’m doing currently.

The CSS guide by Eric Meyers is super awesome for reference, history and basic concepts.  Thanks Boot!  I’ve done a lot of web searches for other guides as well and I always like to look at designs over on Web Cremé.  I do find a lot of those designs are a bit much sometimes.

I still firmly believe a great design can be accomplished with minimal coding.  Some designs I’ve come across that look superb have a stylesheet that is just quagmired with lines of code.  I try to build things simple first and if more complexity is needed, add it in slowly.

I am by no means an expert but I’m here and I’m doing my job and learning.  In the volatile world of wide webs, we’re always learning.

Supernova witnessed by satellite

A supernova is a cataclysmic ending to the life of a large star.  The reason these stars explode (supernova) is due to the fact they are too large to sustain equilibrium for very long.  Our Sun is calm middle sized star that should last 5 billion more years or so.  Massive stars lifespans can be measured in millions of years.

Well recently we’ve witnessed a star going supernova.  One scientist compared it to winning the lottery.  I’d say it’s probably more probable to win the lottery.  People win lotteries every week!  We’ve only ever witnessed a supernova the moment it happened just this once, so far.

NASA’s Swift satellite caught the exploding star in action.  As stated in the article, we’re used to seeing stars after they explode, never the moment they do explode.  A comparison the article makes is it would be like seeing fireworks a couple of seconds after exploding.  It’s still cool to see but, if astronomers are anything like me, they like things that go BOOM!

Why do large stars supernova?

Long story short:
Huge stars burn their fuel at an amazing rate.  This fuel is what keeps stars in equilibrium.  This means that the outward force of nuclear fusion reactions is equal to the inward force of gravity.  One tries to blow it up, the other tries to crunch it down. 

It looks something like this:
>>>><<<omg it’s hot in here>>><<<<
(like my diagram?)

As a massive star runs low on fuel the inward force overpowers the outward force.  Once the balance is lost, the star collapses.  Once the collapse begins an unstoppable chain reaction occurs that rips the star apart in spectacular fashion.  The star is blown apart and it’s outer layes are hurled into space.  Whatever is left of the interior might possibly become a neutron star or a black hole, depending on the original mass of the star.

CNN Article
NASA Article

NASA Solar Probe

This really got me worked up. It wasn’t enough that it’s a space probe which is inherently cool! It’s a probe headed to the sun, obviously. What makes this one different? Well a few things do!

For starters this probe will travel 8 times closer than any previous probe. It will get as close as 4.1 million miles. It sounds like a lot but consider we are 93 million miles away. I suddenly want to break into a TMBG song! Anyhow, it gets cooler, or hotter, depending on if you like puns or not. This spacecraft will also achieve the fastest speed of any probe ever launched. Ever.

The top speed of this craft will be around 450,000mph (about 724,000km/h for you metric folks!). That is nearly half a million miles per hour! You could travel to the moon in about half an hour. That’s what made me so giddy about this one.

It goes up in 2015 and will help us to better understand some mysteries of our nearest star. One of which is why the Corona is 1.8 million degrees (F) vs the comparably chilly surface of 11,000F. I’m not converting that to metric, sorry, it’s late and I’m tired 🙂

It’s a great time to be a science nut!

CNN article: http://www.cnn.com/2008/TECH/05/18/solar.probe/index.html
Official site: http://solarprobe.gsfc.nasa.gov